Segment
1. Nokian Seasonproof 1 Upper-middle2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof 1 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Firestone Multiseason 2 has a better rating of 58% compared to 41% of the Nokian Seasonproof 1. The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof 1 was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Multiseason 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Seasonproof 1 and the Multiseason 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Seasonproof 1 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Firestone Multiseason 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof 1
| Firestone Multiseason 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof 1 | 41.2 | 60.1 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 64.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
