• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

The comparison at hand is between two summer tyres, the Nokian Powerproof and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. These tyres were put to the test against multiple other contenders and our findings are based on the accumulated data. Let's explore their strengths, and weakness regarding their performance.


Made in Finland, the Nokian Powerproof shows an impressive overall performance with an aggregate rating of 71%. Noteworthy is its wet braking capability making it a reliable choice for variable summer weather conditions. The tyre managed to earn the 2nd position in the Autobild test among 50 other tyres. In the ADAC test, it landed the 11th spot performing exceptionally well in terms of quietness with a diminished interior noise.


The Kumho Ecsta PS71, on the other hand, boasts a slightly higher overall rating of 72%. It is particularly known for its aquaplaning resistance, both cross and longitudinal, which was additionally recognized in the ADAC test where it bagged the 10th position. In the Autobild test, it managed the 5th position making it one of the top contenders there too.


Both of these tyres are part of the summer collection of their respective manufacturers, Nokian and Kumho. At present, neither Nokian Powerproof nor Kumho Ecsta PS71 have been replaced by newer models, making them current and relevant choices for summer tyres.


Despite their separate strengths, these tyres offer a reasonably close performance with their overall ratings only being 1% apart. While the Nokian Powerproof excels in terms of wet braking and reduced noise, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 stands out for its resistance against aquaplaning. Considering their performance in both tests, although Kumho fared better than Nokian in the ADAC test, Nokian outperformed Kumho in the Autobild.


In conclusion, if you prioritize lower noise and better wet braking performance, the Nokian Powerproof would be an ideal pick. Conversely, if stronger resistance against aquaplaning is what you seek, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 might be a better option.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Nokian Powerproof
78%
Nokian
Powerproof
Kumho Ecsta PS71
77%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Wet Braking
Nokian Powerproof
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Wet Handling
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
70%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
58%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
89%
Aquaplaning Cross
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Nokian
Powerproof
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Dry Braking
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
Dry Handling
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Noise Exterior
Nokian Powerproof
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Noise Interior
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
64%
Ride Comfort
Nokian Powerproof
71%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Rolling Resistance
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison