Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost5. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.334. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
