Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.583. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
