Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kleber (58%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Powerproof and the Dynaxer HP4 were tested. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||