Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle4. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost5. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost7. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Let's compare two summer tyres, the Nokian Powerproof and the Fulda SportControl 2, both highly rated choices when it comes to grip and performance. Here, we'll examine their strengths and shortcomings as revealed in multiple tests, and summarize which is the overall better tyre.
The Nokian Powerproof, manufactured in Finland, has proven to be a reliable tyre, with our rating of 71%. Strong in dry braking and wet braking, it secured the 7th position among 11 tyres tested by Autobild. In the Autobild 2022 tests, it demonstrated good aquaplaning properties and convincing dynamic wet handling, together with short braking distances. However, it showed a delayed steering response and reduced stability on dry tracks, restricted mileage and a high price level.
On the other hand, the Fulda SportControl 2 stands out with our rating of 84%. Despite its 11th position in the Autobild test, it has some notable strengths. It scored well in terms of exterior noise, comfort, and rolling resistance. According to the Autobild 2022 summary, this tyre showed good aquaplaning reserves and short braking distances on both wet and dry tracks. Additionally, it has a good price-performance ratio. Nevertheless, its downsides include noticeably delayed steering response and modest mileage.
In summary, while both tyres demonstrate good braking performance and aquaplaning properties, the Nokian Powerproof shines in wet conditions, but falls short in terms of steering on dry tracks and overall price. The Fulda SportControl 2 scores high for comfort and noise level but lacks in steering response and mileage.
Neither of these tyres have been replaced by newer models yet. For further information, visit the official manufacturer's page for Fulda tyres and for Nokian tyres.
In conclusion, the choice between these two tyres would significantly depend on your specific driving needs and budget. Both tyres perform exceedingly well in their respective strengths and have minor weak points to consider.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Fulda SportControl 2 11.073. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.585. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.866. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.387. Imperial EcoSport 2 45.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary3. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended6. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended5. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 40 | 33,3 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
