Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle3. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle5. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost7. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
The following is a text comparison of Nokian Powerproof and Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 tyres, conducted for our tyre test website. The goal is to present a fair comparison of these two tyres based on various tests we've performed and then summarize their abilities and overall performance.
Nokian Powerproof, a summer tyre made in Finland, carries a rating of 71% in our tests. Its greatest strengths lie in dry and wet braking. In the Autobild test, for example, out of 50 tyres, Powerproof secured the second position, indicating impressive braking ability. Nevertheless, issues such as slow steering response and low stability on dry tracks, limited life-span, and high pricing have been reported. Overall, the Nokian Powerproof is dynamic on wet surfaces but can struggle with control on dry tarmac.
On the other hand, Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2, a summer tyre of subclass UUHP, uplifts this comparison by scoring 79% in our evaluations. It performed well in aquaplaning - longitudal, and comfort during the Autobild test, in which it ranked 17th out of 50 tyres. Notably, it demonstrates strong aquaplaning features, precise handling on wet surfaces, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, as well as a good level of comfort. These positive aspects, combined with its modest pricing, make it a strong contender. However, the Dunlop's delayed responses during steering on dry surfaces are noticeable.
In the Autozeitung test, despite fewer participants, the Nokian Powerproof finished 6th, while the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 ended in the 8th position. Furthermore, the Gute-Fahrt test saw the Nokian tyre in the 4th position, slightly outshone by the Dunlop tyre, that bagged the 3rd position. Both tyres proved themselves with superb aquaplaning - cross, and aquaplaning - longitudal.
In conclusion, both the Nokian Powerproof and the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 prove to be high quality tyres from reputable manufacturers Nokian and Dunlop. The Dunlop stands out with its superior overall performance, particularly in comfort and water displacement, while the Nokian Powerproof performs admirably in dry and wet braking. The choice between the two will largely depend on the specific driving conditions and customer requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.453. Fulda SportControl 2 11.074. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.586. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.387. Imperial EcoSport 2 45.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary3. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary4. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended5. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended6. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 40 | 33,3 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 85 | 83 | 87 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 80 | 78 | 83 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,3 | 33 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
