• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Let's look at a comparison between two notable summer tyres, the Nokian Powerproof (Nokian is the manufacturer) and the Bridgestone Potenza S001 produced by Bridgestone. Both models have participated in various tests and we will summarize their performances to help you make an informed decision.


The Nokian Powerproof is a summer tyre made in Finland, rating 52% on our scale. This model has now been replaced by the Nokian Powerproof 1, building upon the strengths of its predecessor. In the Autobild test, out of 50 tyres, the Nokian Powerproof ranked second, particularly praised for its wet braking capabilities. However, in a separate ADAC test which focused on noise and interior noise among 16 tyres, it came in at the 11th place.


On the other hand, we have the Bridgestone Potenza S001, a popular summer tyre model. Its standout feature according to the ADAC test is resistance to aquaplaning, landing it the 9th spot among 16 competitors. The Potenza S001 also performed well in the Autobild test, taking the third position overall. The Potenza S001 has not been replaced by a newer model.


Verdict: Compared head to head, the Nokian Powerproof offers excellent wet braking capabilities, making it a viable choice in rainy conditions. However, if noise reduction is a priority for you, it may not be the top scorer. The Bridgestone Potenza S001 cites resistance to aquaplaning as its main strength, making it reliable in wet conditions, too. Rankings in the tests suggest that both tyres perform well overall, with the Powerproof getting a slight edge over the Bridgestone model in terms of performance.


In conclusion, both the Nokian Powerproof and Bridgestone Potenza S001 have unique strengths, but selecting the right one depends upon your specific needs and driving conditions. We recommend checking the newer model, Nokian Powerproof 1 in case it fits your requirements.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Nokian Powerproof
78%
Nokian
Powerproof
Bridgestone Potenza S001
66%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Wet Braking
Nokian Powerproof
92%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Wet Handling
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
46%
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (89.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Nokian
Powerproof
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Dry Braking
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Dry Handling
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Noise Exterior
Nokian Powerproof
73%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
60%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Noise Interior
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Ride Comfort
Nokian Powerproof
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Bridgestone Potenza S001
80%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rolling Resistance
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof
62%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison