14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nexen (47%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 38% of the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 /38%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 13x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 27.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 12.85

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

72

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 71%

Wet handling

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

72

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 65%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 80%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 68%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

71

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 63%

Price/value

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 62%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

84

Exterior noise

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nexen
WinGuard Sport 2 WU7

74

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 70%

Dry handling

1. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	37,9	31,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	36,3	26,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	3+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7	34	28,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

Comparison: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands