• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Firestone Roadhawk

Today we will be comparing two widely popular summer tyres, Nexen N Fera Primus and Firestone Roadhawk on the basis of various tyres tests and evaluations conducted.


Nexen N Fera Primus, manufactured by Nexen, features in the ultra high performance (UHP) subtype. This model has an overall rating of 71% as per our evaluation. One of its notable accomplishments is that it ranked 10th in tests conducted by both Autobild and ADAC, outperforming a considerable count of 51 and 50 types of tyres respectively. The Primus particularly shines in conditions of Aquaplaning - longitudal, as noted in Autobild's test. Critics also praised its good braking performance and dynamic wet handling capacities. However, they pointed out a delayed steering response and limited tyre life or economy.


On the other hand, Firestone Roadhawk comes from one of the well-known manufacturers, Firestone. Compared to Nexen N Fera Primus, this model has a lower overall rating of 59%. In tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC, it secured 30th and 20th position respectively. The Roadhawk was complimented for its efficiency, light weight, good dry road handling, and low wear. However, it was found to be less balanced with noticeable underperformance on wet roads and limited tyre life.


It is important to mention that these models cherished their fair share of weaknesses too. Some of the hits for Nexen N Fera Primus included an understeering dry handling, significantly limited tyre life, and increased rolling resistance. Similarly, Firestone Roadhawk demonstrated shortcomings including lack of balance, weaknesses on wet surfaces, and wear-induced performance deterioration.


To summarize, both these tyres demonstrate great individual performances in certain areas. Nexen N Fera Primus tends to shine in Aquaplaning situations and presents good breaking performance while Firestone Roadhawk performs exceptionally well on dry roads and is light-weight. However, considering the cumulative results of multiple tests, Nexen N Fera Primus evidently presents a better-rounded performance making it the preferred choice amongst the two.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Wet Braking
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Wet Handling
Nexen N Fera Primus
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Nexen N Fera Primus
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Nexen N Fera Primus
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Dry Braking
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Dry Handling
Nexen N Fera Primus
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS52 (92.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta HS52 (91.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Noise Exterior
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Best: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Nexen N Fera Primus
56%
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Rolling Resistance
Nexen N Fera Primus
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Mileage
Nexen N Fera Primus
45%
Firestone Roadhawk
73%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (92.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison