Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost5. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost6. Avon ZV7 Lowcost7. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N blue HD plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Maxxis Mecotra 3 vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
6. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
6. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.585. Avon ZV7 18.556. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory5. Nexen N blue HD plus Satisfactory6. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory4. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended5. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
3. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet braking
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet handling
1. Avon ZV7 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
6. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
3. Avon ZV7 75%
Dry handling
1. Avon ZV7 88%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
3. Avon ZV7 69%
Mileage
6. Avon ZV7 55%
Price/value
4. Avon ZV7 25%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Avon ZV7 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus | 35,8 | 32,1 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 37,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
