Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost5. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.584. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus | 35,8 | 32,1 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
