Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

4. Nokian Powerproof 53

5. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 13x

3. Nokian Powerproof 11x

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 10x

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 11.

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 6.15

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 6

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2026

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2026

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

4. Nokian Powerproof 2022

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

5. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended

5. Nexen CP672 A ?