Comparison: Nexen CP672 A vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

5. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

5. Nokian Powerproof 53

6. Nexen CP672 A 2

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

4. Nokian Powerproof 11x

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 2.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 21.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Nokian Powerproof 2022

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

6. Nexen CP672 A ?

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

5. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended

6. Nexen CP672 A ?