Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Michelin Primacy 4
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R70 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we are looking into two tyre models: Michelin Primacy 4 and Kleber Dynaxer HP4. They are both summer tyres suitable for touring, with Primacy 4 earning a rating of 89% on our scale - noted for its exceptional performance and the Dynaxer HP4 securing an 82% rating, making it a good overall choice.
Michelin Primacy 4 performed excellent in tests, standing 5th out of 53 tyres tested by Autobild, applauded for its dry handling and comfort. ADAC also ranked it 5th among 17 tyres, noting its safety, mileage, and dry braking capabilities. This tyre replaced Michelin Primacy 3 and is now replaced by Michelin Primacy 4+. Visit Michelin to learn more about their range of premium tyres.
The strong points of Primacy 4 include handling characteristics, sharp response, good aquaplaning reserves, and short braking distances. Not to forget, it offers high mileage and low rolling resistance although it is priced on a higher end. Some minor weaknesses include slight drawbacks on wet surfaces.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4, on the other hand, held 14th position out of 53 in Autobild tests, appreciated for its comfort and exterior noise reduction, and 11th out of 17 by ADAC. Good aquaplaning features, short stopping distances on wet and dry tarmac, great riding comfort, and low noise level has been its plus points. However, not so lively grip on wet surfaces, delayed steering response, and under-steering behavior on dry pavement were observed. Visit Kleber to learn more about their unique range of tyres.
In mutual tests, Michelin Primacy 4 overall outperformed Kleber Dynaxer HP4, specifically in handling and dry braking, which is vital for safety. However, both tyres faced mild challenges on wet surfaces. If pricing is not a barrier, Michelin Primacy 4 could be a better choice for its superior performance and higher ratings, while Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is best suited for those prioritizing comfort and noise reduction.
Always choose a tyre based on your specific requirements and the prevalent weather condition in your area. Stay tuned to our tyre tests page and make the right tyre swap decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended2. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,7 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4 | 35,8 | 30,4 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
