18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Michelin Primacy 4 /0%	Continental PremiumContact 7 /98%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /69%	Bridgestone Turanza 6 /77%	Vredestein ULTRAC /16%

Dimensions	R14 - R23	R16 - R21	R13 - R23	R14 - R20	R16 - R22	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium

5. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Michelin Primacy 4 384

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 225

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 81

6. Continental PremiumContact 7 66

Number of tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 25x

2. Michelin Primacy 4 20x

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 16x

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 12x

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

Best position in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 1.

2. Michelin Primacy 4 1.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2.

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 2.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Primacy 4 8.

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 8.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 16.

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 20.

Average position in tests

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2.24

2. Michelin Primacy 4 3.5

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 6.25

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25

Year of the last test

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 2026

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 2025

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 2025

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

6. Michelin Primacy 4 2022

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary

3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended

4. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Good

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Good

4. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

6. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
PremiumContact 7

86%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

84%

Michelin
Primacy 4

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

73%

Wet braking

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 94%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 86%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 76%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 93%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 76%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 59%

6. Michelin Primacy 4 59%

Wet handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 85%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 77%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 77%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Vredestein ULTRAC 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 77%

3. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

5. Michelin Primacy 4 73%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 71%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 92%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 84%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 80%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

Wet side guide

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 100%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 73%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 68%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 A

3. Michelin Primacy 4 A

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

6. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4

84%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

83%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

77%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

75%

Dry braking

1. Michelin Primacy 4 91%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 90%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 83%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 71%

Dry handling

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 83%

4. Michelin Primacy 4 81%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 79%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 78%

Dry lane changing

1. Michelin Primacy 4 90%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 85%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 84%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 82%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Dry steering response

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 96%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 86%

3. Bridgestone Turanza 6 84%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 80%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 0%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4

78%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

76%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

73%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

0%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

0%

Gravel traction

1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 87%

2. Michelin Primacy 4 82%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Vredestein ULTRAC 69%

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Grass traction

1. Michelin Primacy 4 88%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 71%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 61%

4. Bridgestone Turanza 6 62%

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
ULTRAC

83%

Michelin
Primacy 4

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

74%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

58%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin Primacy 4 78%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 75%

3. Vredestein ULTRAC 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 69%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 65%

Comfort

1. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 76%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 66%

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 0%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 0%

Interior noise

1. Continental PremiumContact 7 88%

2. Vredestein ULTRAC 86%

3. Michelin Primacy 4 82%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 73%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 51%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 ?

3. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 4

87%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

79%

Continental
PremiumContact 7

78%

Bridgestone
Turanza 6

68%

Vredestein
ULTRAC

55%

Rolling resistance

1. Michelin Primacy 4 88%

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 79%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 78%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 75%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 67%

Mileage

1. Michelin Primacy 4 93%

2. Continental PremiumContact 7 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 70%

5. Bridgestone Turanza 6 70%

6. Vredestein ULTRAC 29%

Price/value

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 97%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 90%

3. Michelin Primacy 4 83%

4. Continental PremiumContact 7 77%

5. Vredestein ULTRAC 71%

6. Bridgestone Turanza 6 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin Primacy 4 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

5. Continental PremiumContact 7 C

6. Vredestein ULTRAC ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands