• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport

In a head-to-head comparison between the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Continental PremiumContact 6, the features and performance of these two premium summer tyres provide a clear guide for consumers to make the right choice. Various tyre tests have spotlighted the strengths and weaknesses of both, with Michelin often outperforming Continental.


The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores highly in almost all categories, with a 93% rating on our site. It consistently ranked high in mutual tests, outshining the Continental PremiumContact 6 in several areas. This tyre has excellent dry handling, comfort, and rolling resistance, as well as impressive aquaplaning management, both longitudally and cross. Its wet handling is also noteworthy - an attribute that deemed vital for summer tyres. However, the Pilot Sport 4 has now been replaced by the Michelin Pilot Sport 5


In contrast, the Continental PremiumContact 6 - a touring subtype tyre - received an 87% rating from us. While this tyre does not match the Michelin's performance, it is praised for its dry braking, handling, mileage, and price to value ratio. Despite ranking lower in tests comparatively, it notably takes the crown in some, including ADAC's, where it was deemed better due to its outstanding mileage, wet braking, and handling. However, the tyre has visible weaknesses, particularly in aquaplaning safety reserves and is also now replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


It is essential to take into account that test results can vary based on factors like usage, driving conditions and personal preference. Both tyres, manufactured by Michelin and Continental respectively, have unique strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, the chosen tyre should align with the specific needs and preferences of the individual driver.


In conclusion, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 outperforms the Continental PremiumContact 6. However, the Continental tyre still presents a valid choice, especially for those prioritising mileage and value. It's worth noting that both these models have been replaced, so considering their successors could be a wise choice.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
84%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
77%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Nexen N fera Sport
78%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Wet Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Nexen N fera Sport
92%
Wet Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
70%
Nexen N fera Sport
73%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
58%
Nexen N fera Sport
69%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
89%
Nexen N fera Sport
85%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Nexen N fera Sport
70%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
94%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Dry Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Dry Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
75%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Noise Exterior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Nexen N fera Sport
79%
Noise Interior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
64%
Nexen N fera Sport
64%
Best: Nokian Powerproof (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
79%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Nexen N fera Sport
87%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Nexen N fera Sport
62%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison