• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

In a head-to-head comparison between the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the Continental PremiumContact 6, the features and performance of these two premium summer tyres provide a clear guide for consumers to make the right choice. Various tyre tests have spotlighted the strengths and weaknesses of both, with Michelin often outperforming Continental.


The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores highly in almost all categories, with a 93% rating on our site. It consistently ranked high in mutual tests, outshining the Continental PremiumContact 6 in several areas. This tyre has excellent dry handling, comfort, and rolling resistance, as well as impressive aquaplaning management, both longitudally and cross. Its wet handling is also noteworthy - an attribute that deemed vital for summer tyres. However, the Pilot Sport 4 has now been replaced by the Michelin Pilot Sport 5


In contrast, the Continental PremiumContact 6 - a touring subtype tyre - received an 87% rating from us. While this tyre does not match the Michelin's performance, it is praised for its dry braking, handling, mileage, and price to value ratio. Despite ranking lower in tests comparatively, it notably takes the crown in some, including ADAC's, where it was deemed better due to its outstanding mileage, wet braking, and handling. However, the tyre has visible weaknesses, particularly in aquaplaning safety reserves and is also now replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


It is essential to take into account that test results can vary based on factors like usage, driving conditions and personal preference. Both tyres, manufactured by Michelin and Continental respectively, have unique strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, the chosen tyre should align with the specific needs and preferences of the individual driver.


In conclusion, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 outperforms the Continental PremiumContact 6. However, the Continental tyre still presents a valid choice, especially for those prioritising mileage and value. It's worth noting that both these models have been replaced, so considering their successors could be a wise choice.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
89%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
82%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Wet Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Wet Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
82%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
74%
Aquaplaning Cross
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
84%
Best: Sava Intensa UHP 2 (100.0%)
Best in category: Sava Intensa UHP 2 (90.8%)
Dry Performance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
97%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
95%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Dry Braking
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Dry Handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
97%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
Best: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Noise Exterior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
59%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
74%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Noise Interior
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
64%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Best: Nokian Powerproof (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Economy
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
78%
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho Ecsta PS71
56%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rolling Resistance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
32%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
74%
Fuel Efficiency
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
53%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison