In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 83% of the Michelin ALPIN 7. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the ALPIN 7 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin ALPIN 7 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where ALPIN 7 is made - Spain/Germany.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2025 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Michelin ALPIN 7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.