Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.353. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,0 |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
