Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Matador (47%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 56% compared to 47% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the MP93 Nordicca and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||