Segment
1. Toyo Observe S944 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost5. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Toyo Observe S944 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Observe S944 14.824. Barum Polaris 5 15.155. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory5. Toyo Observe S944 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Toyo Observe S944 Satisfactory4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| Toyo Observe S944 | 35,7 | 30,8 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Toyo Observe S944 | 37,7 | 26,8 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
