Segment
3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium4. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle6. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good4. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory6. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended4. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended6. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Rating: Sufficient | 5,5 | 6,6 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Very good | 9,0 | 9,7 | 8 | 8 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
