Segment
2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle5. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary3. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory5. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended5. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Rating: Sufficient | 5,5 | 6,6 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 9,6 | 9,2 | 7 | 6 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
