Segment
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Linglong (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max HP010 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max HP010
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Linglong Green-Max HP010 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||