Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle4. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36.5 | 29.5 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 37.1 | 29.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
