Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Laufenn (31%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 3% of the Laufenn i*Fit + LW31. The first tyre test of Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the i*Fit + LW31 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
