• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 67% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.

# Kumho WinterCraft WP52
/55%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
/67%

Add to comparison

New comparison
Kumho
Nokian
DimensionsR0 - R21 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Kumho WinterCraft WP5235,927,3
Nokian WR Snowproof P3626,2
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+2+
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Rating: Satisfactory		3+22-2
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory		3+22-2
Show test details