Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nexen (34%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 38% of the Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the Winguard Snow G3 WH21 were tested. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 37.7 | 32.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||