Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Premium2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle4. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Exemplary2. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory4. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Sufficient3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3 | 2 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 | 35.6 | 30.2 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
