Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than GT (50%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea and Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 is made in China.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 | 37,3 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||