Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 95% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 245/45 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient | 2.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | 36.9 | 29.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | |||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | |||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | 33,9 | 30,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||