Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Firestone (56%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C rating. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
