Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Avon ZV7
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Great Britain (Avon). Avon is a brand that belongs to the Cooper group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Avon (0%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 55% compared to 17% of the Avon ZV7. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the Avon ZV7 first tested. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Avon ZV7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
2. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Avon ZV7 Sufficient2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Avon ZV7 79%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet handling
1. Avon ZV7 85%
Wet circle cornering
1. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
2. Avon ZV7 0%
Snow braking
2. Avon ZV7 0%
Snow handling
2. Avon ZV7 0%
Snow cornering
2. Avon ZV7 0%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Avon ZV7 82%
Comfort
2. Avon ZV7 0%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Avon ZV7 69%
Mileage
2. Avon ZV7 55%
Price/value
2. Avon ZV7 25%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Avon ZV7 75%
Dry handling
1. Avon ZV7 88%
