Segment
2. Dunlop Winter Premium4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle6. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Dunlop Winter 1.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Dunlop Winter Exemplary3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
Worst rating in test
5. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Winter Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 36.2 | 27.1 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter | 33.3 | 27.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
