Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium3. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle5. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 39.9 | 59.0 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 64.0 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.8 | 2.3 | 3.8 | ||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
