Segment
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (56%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS91 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS91 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 68% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea and Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is made in Germany.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,5 | 9,5 | 9,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,3 | 8,4 | 5,9 | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 9,1 | 9,4 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||