• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Vredestein ULTRAC are two notable summer tyres that deliver different performances across their respective fields. Each of these tyres have their strengths and offer an all-round performance under various conditions.


A successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an impressive 81% rating from our test. This is in part due to its excellent performance on both wet and dry surfaces, dependable mileage and wet circle cornering. With a focus on dry handling, braking, and price-value ratio, this tyre excels in the Autobild and ADAC tests. However, its Aquaplaning feature may need further improvements for an even better performance.


Flipping the coin, the Vredestein ULTRAC scores strikingly well on dry and wet surfaces, showing minimal chances of Aquaplaning. It shows its prowess in the Autoklub ČR test, where it ranks 7th out of 19 tyres tested. Plus points to this Vredestein's model are secured by its excellent wet handling, short dry braking distances and powerful Aquaplaning resistance. However, an increased rolling resistance and external noise along with a lesser mileage compared to the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mark it down slightly in our test ratings, garnering a 42% overall.


Though the Vredestein ULTRAC shows a strong suit in wet conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 pulls ahead with a better overall performance. Plus, its superior mileage and price-value ratio make the Kumho's model a clear winner in the overall performance, retaining its worthiness among touring tyres.


To sum up, both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein ULTRAC deliver excellent dry and wet handling respectively. They prove to be durable and are efficient for long drives. If mileage and price-value ratio are a priority, then the Kumho Ecsta HS52 proves to be a safer bet. Meanwhile, the Vredestein ULTRAC's excellent wet handling and Aquaplaning resistance make it a strong competitor. Choosing between these tyres would mostly depend on the user's preference and driving conditions.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
73%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
87%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
92%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
92%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
46%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
32%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Michelin Primacy 4+
93%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
59%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (92.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison