• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Vredestein ULTRAC are two notable summer tyres that deliver different performances across their respective fields. Each of these tyres have their strengths and offer an all-round performance under various conditions.


A successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an impressive 81% rating from our test. This is in part due to its excellent performance on both wet and dry surfaces, dependable mileage and wet circle cornering. With a focus on dry handling, braking, and price-value ratio, this tyre excels in the Autobild and ADAC tests. However, its Aquaplaning feature may need further improvements for an even better performance.


Flipping the coin, the Vredestein ULTRAC scores strikingly well on dry and wet surfaces, showing minimal chances of Aquaplaning. It shows its prowess in the Autoklub ČR test, where it ranks 7th out of 19 tyres tested. Plus points to this Vredestein's model are secured by its excellent wet handling, short dry braking distances and powerful Aquaplaning resistance. However, an increased rolling resistance and external noise along with a lesser mileage compared to the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mark it down slightly in our test ratings, garnering a 42% overall.


Though the Vredestein ULTRAC shows a strong suit in wet conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 pulls ahead with a better overall performance. Plus, its superior mileage and price-value ratio make the Kumho's model a clear winner in the overall performance, retaining its worthiness among touring tyres.


To sum up, both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein ULTRAC deliver excellent dry and wet handling respectively. They prove to be durable and are efficient for long drives. If mileage and price-value ratio are a priority, then the Kumho Ecsta HS52 proves to be a safer bet. Meanwhile, the Vredestein ULTRAC's excellent wet handling and Aquaplaning resistance make it a strong competitor. Choosing between these tyres would mostly depend on the user's preference and driving conditions.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
58%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
68%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Vredestein ULTRAC
94%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (94.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Vredestein ULTRAC
98%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
55%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (80.9%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 7 (91.8%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
74%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
61%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Best: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 (100.0%)
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
53%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (91.0%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
42%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Vredestein ULTRAC
24%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (100.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison