• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (4)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2024 215/55 R17 View
Autoklub ČR Autoklub ČR
Summer
2023 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Vredestein ULTRAC are two notable summer tyres that deliver different performances across their respective fields. Each of these tyres have their strengths and offer an all-round performance under various conditions.


A successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an impressive 81% rating from our test. This is in part due to its excellent performance on both wet and dry surfaces, dependable mileage and wet circle cornering. With a focus on dry handling, braking, and price-value ratio, this tyre excels in the Autobild and ADAC tests. However, its Aquaplaning feature may need further improvements for an even better performance.


Flipping the coin, the Vredestein ULTRAC scores strikingly well on dry and wet surfaces, showing minimal chances of Aquaplaning. It shows its prowess in the Autoklub ČR test, where it ranks 7th out of 19 tyres tested. Plus points to this Vredestein's model are secured by its excellent wet handling, short dry braking distances and powerful Aquaplaning resistance. However, an increased rolling resistance and external noise along with a lesser mileage compared to the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mark it down slightly in our test ratings, garnering a 42% overall.


Though the Vredestein ULTRAC shows a strong suit in wet conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 pulls ahead with a better overall performance. Plus, its superior mileage and price-value ratio make the Kumho's model a clear winner in the overall performance, retaining its worthiness among touring tyres.


To sum up, both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein ULTRAC deliver excellent dry and wet handling respectively. They prove to be durable and are efficient for long drives. If mileage and price-value ratio are a priority, then the Kumho Ecsta HS52 proves to be a safer bet. Meanwhile, the Vredestein ULTRAC's excellent wet handling and Aquaplaning resistance make it a strong competitor. Choosing between these tyres would mostly depend on the user's preference and driving conditions.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (94.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Best in category: Vredestein Ultrac (89.9%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance (94.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Best: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 (100.0%)
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
43%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (97.3%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison