• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

In the comparison between the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Maxxis Premitra HP5, both summer tyres produced by Kumho and Maxxis respectively, we have compiled data from several tests and reviews to help users make the best choice.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, which is a direct successor to the highly-rated Kumho Ecsta HS51, scores an impressive 73% in our ratings versus 56% by its competitor, the Maxxis Premitra HP5. Moreover, the HS52's performance in the Autobild test where it finished third out of 51 tyres further endorses its supremacy.


On the road, HS52's pronounced strengths are dry handling, dry braking, and wet braking. Its ability to offer compelling performance on both wet and dry surfaces, together with a superb braking efficiency is noteworthy. However, a slight setback might be an average ride comfort. Moreover, some users have reported a slight delay in steering response. Overall, it offers good value for money, especially considering its performance credentials.


On the contrary, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 ranks 16th in the same Autobild test. Yet, the tyre fares well in aquaplaning scenarios - both cross and longitudinal, providing excellent safety features. The Premitra HP5 is also reported to deliver good mileage, and effective dry braking. But a considerable drawback of this tyre is its lackluster grip level on both wet and dry surfaces. Further, drivers might notice a slightly delayed steering response, a below-average tread life and an increased rolling resistance.


In conclusion, both tyres perform admirably under various conditions, but the authentic winner in this comparison test is the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The HS52's consistent performance under different terrains and conditions, coupled with its value for money, makes it a better choice. However, users who experience more wet drives and are looking for better aquaplaning resistance could consider the Maxxis Premitra HP5.


Please note that it is always important to choose a tyre that best suits the specific conditions and driving preferences. For more specific details, please visit each product at Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Maxxis Premitra HP5.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Maxxis Premitra HP5
71%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
57%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
61%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
86%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Maxxis Premitra HP5
66%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
75%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Maxxis Premitra HP5
71%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
65%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
55%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison