• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 are two excellent tyre models that offer distinct benefits for drivers. Seen as summer tyres, both these models have undergone multiple tests and reviews to measure their performance under diverse conditions. An in-depth analysis reveals across-the-board strengths and weaknesses and lets us conclude on their overall performance comparatively.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, created by the renowned Kumho brand, excels when it comes to dry braking and handling, as well as wet braking. It is also praised for its good value for the price, according to Autobild 2024. However, it does show some weaknesses in environmental impact, efficiency, and sustainability. Additionally, some drivers have experienced delayed steering response. Despite these shortcomings, this model still garnered a commendable 6th place out of 21 in the Autobild test, and 8th out of 50 in the ADAC test.


Moving onto the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, produced by Kleber, it's particularly noted for its comfort, exterior noise control, and environmental performance. Comparatively, it also has good tyre wear and overall efficiency. However, this model might disappoint when it comes supplying balanced performance and wet road grip. It could potentially devalue due to its inferior performance on wet surfaces. It also showcases delayed steering response and understeering on dry surfaces. This model was positioned at number 13, a few places behind the Kumho Ecsta HS52, in Autobild's test and 12th in the ADAC test.


The former Kumho Ecsta HS51 model has been succeeded by the HS52 model. However, no newer tyre has replaced the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 as of now.


In conclusion, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 in most aspects, although both have their individual strong points. While Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores high on dry and wet handling, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 offers better comfort and noise control. However, the overall rating of the two models stands close with Kumho Ecsta HS52 carrying 78% and Kleber Dynaxer HP4, 76% rating.


Regardless, the ultimate choice between the two tyres should consider individual driving conditions and preferences.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
53%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
65%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
68%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
88%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison