• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (3)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
ADAC ADAC
Summer
2024 215/55 R17 View
Autoklub ČR Autoklub ČR
Summer
2023 205/55 R16 View

When comparing the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Continental PremiumContact 7 tyres, it's evident that both models provide some commendable features, though there is also some differentiation in their performance according to numerous tests. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Continental PremiumContact 7 are both suitable for summer and are of the touring subtype. Continental, known for their quality products, crafted PremiumContact 7 in multiple factories across Europe while the origin of the HS52 by Kumho has not been specified.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 got an overall rating of 78% and can be a great choice for its excellent dry handling and short dry braking distances. Multiple test results highlighted its performance in terms of dry braking, dry handling and wet circle cornering. Autobild praised the HS52 for its convincing performance on both wet and dry surfaces along with its reasonable price. However, according to Autobild, the tyre could improve its rolling comfort.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 7 carries a commendable rating of 99%, and it topped the list in some tests. Besides its excellent dry braking, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, it also provides comfortable driving according to ADAC and Autoklub ČR. Autobild has lauded the PremiumContact 7 for its exemplary performance on both dry and wet surfaces. Additionally, its dry braking, dry handling, and wet handling were very positively assessed in several tests. On the downside, the PremiumContact 7 had an average rolling resistance, aquaplaning resistance and increased external noise, as per TyreReviews.com.


The earlier version of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was Kumho Ecsta HS51 whereas the Continental PremiumContact 7 is the successor of Continental PremiumContact 6 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5.


While both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, overall test results indicate the Continental PremiumContact 7 tyre outperforms the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in most areas, although the latter delivers noticeable performance according to its price range. Make sure to consider specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two summer touring tyre models.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Best: Vredestein Ultrac (98.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Best: Vredestein Ultrac (96.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
61%
Best in category: Vredestein Ultrac (92.6%)
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
97%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance (94.5%)
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Best: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 (100.0%)
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (100.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison