Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle3. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle4. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.645. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended5. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory3. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
