Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium3. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle4. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle6. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Debica Presto HP2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Nokian WetProof 5.645. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.586. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary3. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary4. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended5. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended6. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended3. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory4. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended6. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
