Segment
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has B rating.
| # | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary
2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,8 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | 38,3 | 40,4 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,7 | 35,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||