• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the EcowinG ES01 KH27 and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has B rating.

# Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
/0%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/67%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Falken
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,91,52,10,51,4
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Rating: Satisfactory
2,82,82,82,02,0
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
3,01,82,81,52,2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,534,3
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH2738,340,4
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,735,9
Show test details