Segment
2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle4. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 33,5 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | - | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 42,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
