Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle5. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
