Segment
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 77% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber KRISALP HP3
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 37,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1- | 2- | |||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
