In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 has a better rating of 77% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Kleber KRISALP HP3 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 3 tests
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Nokian WR Snowproof
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.